Lorem ipsum legere pericula salutandi an mei, usu in vivendum senserit. Rebum nulla cum ex, ei tale voluptua forensibus nam. Ex eam agam definiebas reprehendunt, ut nec invenire elaboraret. Eum unum maiorum ex, vis dolorum convenire consetetur cu. In nec hinc eirmod graecis, duo et semper nostro adolescens. Vel eu ignota detraxit instructior, justo moderatius definitionem mel ex. Nullam omnesque ad mel, vim erroribus reprimique adversarium cu, an pro odio aperiri scribentur.

Scientists Are Not, “Playing by the Rules”, When Exploring Intelligent Design

book-kouklGuest: Greg Koukl explores whether science is undermined by a bias against Christian spirituality: “…When people say Intelligent Design is not scientific what’s going on is a trumping of the facts with Materialistic philosophy… They aren’t even allowed to play because they don’t play according to the philosophical rules… and in this case, what you have is a serious problem of aggressive bias that has entered into the process and does not allow the scientist to pursue the evidence where it leads.”

Download MP3 (49:26min, 22.6MB)

Resist the Non-Living Universe Assumption

Guest: Dr. Elisabet Sahtouris, biologist, ecologist, futurist and author, examines why scientists should be skeptical of their assumption that the universe is non-living: “… the fundamental belief in Western science is that this is a non-living universe. No one has ever proved this. I don’t think anyone could prove it. It is an assumption. If I say I want to build a science based on the assumption this is a living universe scientists will say – prove it. But, they don’t have to prove their fundamental assumption that this is a non-living universe. Western science has developed the only culture in history, I think, that has developed the concept of non-life.”

Featured Interview:
• Evolutionary Biologist-Creationist, Dr. Elisabet Sahtouris

Download MP3 (40:19min, 18.5MB)

The Spiritual Brain, Denyse O’Leary

Guest: Christian science writer, and author of The Spiritual Brain, Denyse O’Leary, on the compatibility of Christian doctrine to new discoveries in human consciousness.

Download MP3 (47:18min, 22MB)http://www.tantor.com/BookImage/0538_SpiritualBrain_D.jpg

Denyse O’Leary, co-author of The Spiritual Brain: A neuroscientist’s case for the existence of the soul (HarperOne August 2007). The Mindful Hack publishes information of interest on the relationship between the mind and the brain. O’Leary also publishes the Post-Darwinist, which keeps up with the intelligent design controversy.

Is the Dalai Lama an Atheist? Dr. Alan Wallace

Guest: Buddhist scholar and author of the upcoming Mind in the Balance, Dr. Alan Wallace discusses Buddhism and atheism.http://www.coverbrowser.com/image/science-books/2-8.jpg

Download MP3 (44:31min, 20MB)

Dynamic lecturer, progressive scholar, and one of the most prolific writers and translators of Tibetan Buddhism in the West, B. Alan Wallace, Ph.D., continually seeks innovative ways to integrate Buddhist contemplative practices with Western science to advance the study of the mind.

Dr. Wallace, a scholar and practitioner of Buddhism since 1970, has taught Buddhist theory and meditation worldwide since 1976. Having devoted fourteen years to training as a Tibetan Buddhist monk, ordained by H. H. the Dalai Lama, he went on to earn an undergraduate degree in physics and the philosophy of science at Amherst College and a doctorate in religious studies at Stanford.

Guy Harrison, 50 Reasons People Give for Believing in a God

Guest: Guy P. Harrison, author of, 50 Reasons People Give for Believing in a God

[audio: http://www.reason9.com/podcast/get.php?web=skeptiko-2009-04-28-62115.mp3]http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/41hUiBcoAXL._SL500_.jpg

Download MP3 (30:24min, 14MB)

50 Reasons People Give for Believing in a God is a positive book that encourages people to think freely and challenge the common justifications for belief in gods. There is no name-calling, no condescending attitude and no hate. I am positive and so is this book.

Although the book is thorough and clear about the weaknesses of reasons for belief, it’s gentle enough that one should be able to give a copy to a friend or family member without fear of offending. All I want is a world where people respect science and all minds are free. Don’t you want that, too?